Are there any administrators anymore? It's not that vandalism is rampant or anything...but articles that should have been deleted weeks ago are still here. If no admins are left, I'm going to start a new wiki. The Blood Gulch Wiki.
Oly oly oxen free to all you halo fans out there! OmegaScythe here, I just edited a page about quotes (which I created). A the mo, it only has caboose's comments, but it's good.
hello to anyone on this wiki? I'm new, and my name is Blackadder71. Just to ask, how many members are there on this wiki? Thanks.
- Hi Blackadder. Welcome to the wiki. You can a get a list of this wiki's editors at Special:Activeusers. Angela talk 02:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm. Sounds good. Why not just Red vs. Blue Wiki? That's what I call it--Caboose Orange Juice and Cookies 03:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've uploaded this to Image:Favicon.ico. You might need to refresh your cache by pressing Ctrl and F5 on this page to see it. Angela (talk) 13:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Note to all fellow usersEdit
I would like to request that people please sign Articles on Talk Pages (put --~~~~ on the talk page after your comment.) please and thank you :) --WhellerNG 20:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Please keep Speculation out of the Articles. Articles are a place to put facts about the series. not for people to proclaim there ideas about the show. if you want to talk speculation keep it on the TALK pages please and thank you :) --WhellerNG 17:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey everyone Edit
Hey everyone! My name is Ry and I'm glad to help out here at RvB wiki. I've already created a few pages (Private Jimmy, Private Mickey, Prison Guard, UNSC Maximum Security Detention Facility) and have completely redone a page (Pelican). Feel free to edit them as there will most likely be more info to add later. Anyway, I just want to say that I really like this wiki and hope to talk to everyone sometime. Thanks! --RyRy16 16:56, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
important message Edit
im going to tell ever one to keep hoaxes, speculation, and unfactual information out of articles. ~DA~ is awsome! 20:10, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
due to the problem we have had with Spam, I have contacted the Wikia Staff and explained the situation to them. i have now become an Admin and i shall deal with everything that needs to get done. --WhellerNG 21:39, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
because some people like to keep readding the information that Sarge and Sigma are the same person. THEY ARE NOT. if anyone continues to spread this idea, they will be banned for 2 weeks, this is the only warning your going to get --WhellerNG 19:21, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
This is just a suggestion but I thought maybe this wiki should have a header. I've seen others such as the Halo wiki and the GTA wiki that have them and I thought it would be cool if the RvB wiki had one.--Soul reaper 05:49, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
2 things Edit
1. I think the Episodes section in the side menu needs to be more organised. Maybe have sub-menus of each season and then the episodes in order. 2. Are there any admins on this wiki anymore?
- 2. yes, also sign your comments, otherwise I will not take you seriously.--WhellerNG 01:12, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
Epsilon and ChurchEdit
let's try to remember that Epsilon and Church, while similar. are in fact two different characters entirely. edits to the Wiki should reflect this. the Actual Church's last appearance was in the Recreation trailer. anything after that was Epsilon. --WhellerNG 01:13, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
MediaWiki:Pagetitle feels out of date. Maybe just "- Red vs. Blue Wiki"? Or the more verbose "- Red vs. Blue Wiki: The Blood Gulch Chronicles, Reconstruction, Recreation, Revelation and more!" Just a thought, thanks. --31stCenturyMatt 11:04, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
I agree. It would probably be best just to keep it as "Red vs. Blue Wiki" as suggested. This would keep it from going out of date like the currrent title, due to the fact that Red vs Blue will probably never be renamed. - EdenC
Shouldn't Epsilon be on the blue team section? he is the new Church after all, isn't he? Cyrus Arc 21:52, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
No one is to create or edit into an article for the next season. anyone who does will be banned. --WhellerNG 16:28, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just a heads up-- Edit
Don't know if you all know this, but Burnie answered some pretty critical questions that will change a lot of pages in an exclusive Q&A session done with the Let's Figure This Out Shizno group from RedvsBlue.com.
http://lfto.podomatic.com/player/web/2010-09-22T04_30_06-07_00 Here is the link to the podcast for people to listen. Some of the subjects include what really happened to Tex after she crashed in Valhalla, if the Meta had an original AI, the real core of Tex and Church's relationship, etc.
Nice find man it explains alot.:)Sniperteam82308 11:18, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
I've noticed this around several articles. So I'm issuing a mandate. CT has been portrayed as male through out his time though the series. I want all articles to reflect this. Any mentions to CT are to refer to a male individual. the Character supposedly being female counts as a spoiler for Season 7. --WhellerNG 02:29, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Alright but a spoiler for a season whose been over for a year now with the next season over as well doesn't make sense but ur the admin.Sniperteam82308 02:50, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
But if someone is checking this up on the Wiki shouldn't you should assume that they are looking for the tru7h? I honstly completly missed the fact that she is female whilst watching the series. I understand about not putting up spoilers for something current, like the most recent episode or what have you, but to not include something that is true and not something that most people have already watched, is a bit odd, I think. I'm not trying to get into an argument and was just saying what I think is best for the people who vist this awesome wiki, that are looking for correct information. Sorry for the rambling EdenC 11:10, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- We don't know anything about CT to begin with. almost everything was a lie. the Character is portrayed as male in the series. so articles are to reflect that, --WhellerNG 20:49, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Whatever I just dont think its a spoiler anymore but like you said we know literally nothing about the C.T. we saw. And EdenC do you really have to put a 7 instead of a t it makes you look ten and like you speak 7337 or however you spell it(which I find immature and annoying among other things its just lazy kids that dont know or care enough how to correctly spell) I mean whats next you saying hu instead of who wat instead of what u instead of you? Although if it was just a typo I understand.Sniperteam82308 21:02, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
OK. I suppose when you metion that we don't know much about C.T. that we should stick with him/her being Male for the time being. I think that the small metin on his/her page is fine. And Sinperteam82308 did you really just write that much about a small Bungie referance? I too hate 7337 speak, but to get that worried about it is a bit over the top. EdenC 10:32, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
No no you had put a 7 instead of a T in the word truth but it really doesn't matter:). So I guess with everyone agreeing thats what we do, of course with Wheller being a burecrat admin(nice job by the way) we would have done it anyway.:)Sniperteam82308 13:53, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
That 7 instead of a T was intentional. See http://bungie.wikia.com/wiki/Words%2C_Phrases%2C_and_Memes#Tru7h It is a Bunige referance. Didn't mean for it to be such a big thing. EdenC 15:00, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
Oh well I guess that just shows how I know literally nothing outside of RvB. Haha. Sighs man I need a life.:(Sniperteam82308 15:18, October 10, 2010 (UTC)
I've said this numerous times before but may I add a poll to the wiki homepage with questions on favorite season,character,episode of specific season, most hated character which saga was more enjoyed among many others and I will edit it myself about once a month.Sniperteam82308 21:07, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
Move the wiki? Edit
I'm sure you all know about the changes that wikia are bringing in. Many other wikis are moving or at least considering moving. I think we should conisider moving as well. There is another wiki service run by Shout Wiki (or at least I think that's the name). They offer the same Monaco styles that we currently use and have a service that moves all the files and pages automatically so it's not difficult to do. Just something I think we should consider--Soul reaper 06:50, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
Did the wiki get moved since the above post?220.127.116.11 04:29, December 22, 2010 (UTC)LtRainnAron
Luke McKay DrawingsEdit
All right. I've been seeing this around a lot lately, Luke McKay Drawings are ALL canon (except for Tucker's season 1) because A. Luke McKay works with Roosterteeth, and they have endorsed them. They are allowed in articles, but like CGI images, should not be the character's infobox pictures. Also, descriptions of of characters in articles are not necessary and horribly redundant.--WhellerNG 20:41, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Tex's and Church's arn't either because they have been robots througout all of RvB but even after their deaths were shown as humans so they shouldn't be added should they?Sniperteam82308 20:54, October 18, 2010 (UTC
hey is the rvb unaverce part of the haloverce User:Codythebeast
No. It may have originally tried to start that way but is now its own little thing. In the rvb universe it is the same as Halo in the Halo universe they are seperate.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 05:47, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
I think the wiki needs a Logo since the font is really ugly on the top. I think we could use this:
I think it looks nice. I also say we add a news section. Things won't happen for a while but we could do it weekly for episodes PSAs and DVD/CD releases. Or ya know news. Like title names before a season. Or a preview of this season will be shown here.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 00:46, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
Red vs. Blue Posters - New Profile Pictures? Edit
Rooster Teeth have released posters featuring quotes and a single picture of the character saying them in full original CGI. If anyone here has photoshop, we could erase the rest of the poster and use the image for the articles on the characters.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
If you mean as the main picture then no. Wheller wants real game pictures only not CGI for characters.Template:Sniperteam82308 14:09, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
In regards to the Season 9 ruleEdit
Ok many users on this site have been banned or have been near getting banned to this Season9 rule because they simply didn't know. I say we post this rule on the front page because almost everyday now people come in and think there helping the wiki when adding Season9 details. So my suggestion is putting this rule on the front page so we don't have to tell every single user who comes here.Rvb forever 19:50, March 18, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Or we could make a policy page. Or put it in community guidlines. Personally I think people should look around the wiki for the guidlines before editing.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 20:49, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
i agree even before this Season 9 rule people were getting banned for not knowing the rulesRvb forever 22:46, March 18, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
i think its high time to make a policy pageRvb forever 22:47, March 18, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Yeah which often leads to speculation and edit wars and then leads to pages being locked down.Rvb forever 02:10, March 19, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Their really needs to be more than one admin im worried about this wiki's future when it comes to leadership and governing.Rvb forever 03:47, March 19, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
I've been running for a while... http://rvb.wikia.com/wiki/Red_vs_Blue:Administrators#Sniperteam82308 I've actually got the most votes for and only one vote against... but thats because someone was upset I constantly undid their edits because all they did was add red links. That guy left now anyway. So... maybe if I get a few more Wheller will let me become on and I can add policys as well as some other things I wish to add to this wiki to make it a little more fun or user friendly such as a poll that I will create, close, replace.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 13:40, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Im gonna try and run for admin to i actually was an admin of an old marathon wiki called Durandalpedia. Unfortunatly the wiki closed because people lost intrest but i did a do a great job at maintaining the site for almost a year with the help of other admins of course.Rvb forever 14:14, March 19, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
I'll vote for you but personally i think that me, you and Cyrus should be the next admins. Your popular in the wikia and have been here for quite some time.I have some admin experience and i think Cyrus should be given another chance as he was also banned for not knowing the rules.Rvb forever 14:21, March 19, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Weirdf, I've been running for a while now too, []. I only have, like, two votes. And personally, I would think that only Cyrus, Ralok, and Sniperteam for admins. As I don't really know you very much Rvb. Jman98 18:03, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Cyrus had his powers removed for unabanning another user. I believe they were restored a while ago however. And yay I'm popular on the wiki. And Jman considering Ralok won't be on that much(writing a novel sequel and working on a computer game) I can't say him right now. Once he returns to active status I would say sure why not.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 18:53, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah i don't know you either Jman but you would probably make a good admin but anyways enough of this talk about admins lets get back to this season 9 thing. Wheres WhellerNG? He should hve responded by now.Rvb forever 03:50, March 20, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Doubt it. From experiance he will only respond to tell someone off. Or if it has to do with him directly. Otherwise he will make a single statement and thats it.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 04:49, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Its been 3 days now and no responseRvb forever 05:46, March 20, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Did he leave or something? I mean come on this is kind of important.Rvb forever 17:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
It does content him though if for instance he doesn't respond then he will have to ban more and more people for adding in season 9 details.Rvb forever 22:07, March 20, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
He honestly doesn't care if he has to ban someone. Uhg I am getting sick of reverting all these new users contributions because they are grammarically incorrect, poorly spelled, or just plain wrong.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 22:40, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
Same here im sure you've seen all the edits i been doing for the past few days cleaning pages. I literally stayed up till 1:00am looking at all the minor pages for incorrect grammer.Rvb forever 00:12, March 21, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
I've been putting up deletion templates, undoing all stupid new users stuff. Removing anything that has to do with Season 9. And warning all new users who post Season 9 information. Of course I doubt you or I shall be recognized for what we are doing as we should be.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 00:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
We should be recognised especially since were putting in some much work before season 9 even starts. There only a few users even active right now and we've been working extra hard. I think ive sat by to long not saying anything about this wiki. We NEED more than one admin,we NEED a policy and we NEED a poll. The community is demanding things yet nothing is being done. I been here for about a year now and almost nothings changed.Rvb forever 01:33, March 21, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
One more month it'll be my first year. Please don't tell me yet what kind of cake I am getting. :P But yes I agree. We have to work harder now because of the damn trailer being released. Honestly I love the trailer. Yes I watch it almost everyday. But I could wait till April 1st when Burnie told us that it will be released to everyone. All its been doing is getting people banned and providing us more work. I don't mean to bitch but honestly. And we really don't need a poll but I think it would be a neat little thing to have. Don't you? And well my history tells I am on here every stinking day so I would update it say once a month.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 03:10, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Well with the poll we can do something here besides editing. I think it would be cool. But anyways i looked back at WhellerNG talk page and wow alot of people wanted him de admined. He's not a bad admin i just think he runs this place like a dictator. Ive heard users of being afraid to edit because they'll get banned.Rvb forever 20:49, March 21, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
My main problem with him is he doesn't speak to the community, and he never gives a warning before a block. I am scared of him a bit actually. Thats why I don't add things only remove them.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 21:06, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
We really need some new admins.Though some of us have already applied to be an admin it still has no results.--Soldier Jean 01:27, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
This sucks the only way so far we could become admins if we started a new RVB Wiki.Actually I started one before but I abandoned it.I'm thinking of reviving that wiki and making some prepareations to make it presentable.--Soldier Jean 02:31, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Exactly like a dictator he bans anybody without notice, fails to publish the rules and hardly talks to anyone. I used to be afraid of him when i was new but not anymoreRvb forever 23:41, March 22, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Maybe we should stop bad mouthing Wheller because if he sees about what we say about him our asses will be cooked.--Soldier Jean 00:58, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
If Curus unbans us Wheller might take away his power as an admin permanetly.--Soldier Jean 01:04, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
"oh yeah like it worked so well last time."--Soldier Jean 01:09, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Im not afraid of Wheller he cant just ban us to make an example of us. If he does he will loose his adminship i know it and he knows it.Rvb forever 15:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Yea no. Wikia staff did nothing to help us in the past they won't now. They say its because they don't want to intimidate him. Here is something I have to say to them. HE INTIMIDATES US!Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 15:16, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Seriously.I don't even think Wheller is here anymore.I am going to ask wikia staff if they can give admin powers to me or others.--Soldier Jean 15:18, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I wouldn't count on it sniper we have to wait to see what happens.Rvb forever 19:32, March 28, 2011 (UTC)Rvb forever
Featured Article Edit
Ok we have had that same featured artice for over a year now I think it is time we change it.--Soldier Jean 15:08, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure once we get a page for Season 9 that will be it for a year. I mean we only need to wait a day until we can (hopefully) add a Season 9 page. If not when episode 1 comes out I won't give a fuck I'll add it. I don't get it I mean last year when I was but a sipmly wikia contributer we had a Revelation page months before that started.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 15:11, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Featured articles should not only feature article pages for the seasons it should feature other stuff like character articles for a change.--Soldier Jean 15:13, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
There has to be some changes around here.--Soldier Jean 15:19, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I have to try and conivince wikia staff to give some of us admin powers since are current admin is not even here to do it.We also have to start advertising the wiki today so we can get more editors.--Soldier Jean 15:23, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I know and I'm trying but it won't let me create the group. Perhaps its because my sponsorship expired a week ago? And now... its only what a few hours I can wait that long. Plus anything sponsers only I can just look here to learn about.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 15:27, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
I am just going to advertise on youtube.--Soldier Jean 15:28, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Alright when I decide to get my sponsor ship back I will create it.Your Friend :)Sniperteam82308 15:30, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
Hey people. I was thinking and well... the blogs take up most of the recent history. I often am finding that annoying as I can sometimes never find vandalism that has occured. I know I'm probably the main problem but thats just in my nature I like to talk... there I go rambling I suppose. Anyway. Is it possilbe that you Wheller or you Cyrus
could, no I know you can, would mind making blogs an administrator only tool and we could only have them to update with information on the wiki, Rooster Teeth, or just Red vs. Blue. Commenting could be allowed on those or not. Now this is just a suggestion to how we could all chat without cluttering the recent history space. I suggest that we create a Red vs. Blue Chat wiki where we can go to talk. Please be kind with what you think of this I am merely trying to keep the Recent Activity cleared so we can better see the contributions on pages. Thank you for taking this into consideration.Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 21:13, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
No way that is bull shit.I say we just make a schedule for when we use the blogs.--Soldier Jean 22:58, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah I know.--Soldier Jean 23:10, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
logo idea Edit
Alright, here's a new one I made. It's cleaner, nicer, and has wiki. I think I did really good in my opinion:
I like this one allot. Its got the Season 9 Red vs. Blue as well as a Blood Gulch Chronicles wiki font. I think this one should be the one to replace it.Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 17:19, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
Here's my logo idea Oo7nightfire 15:40, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
That's actually really badass, but, it's too big for the wordmark. But that looks like it'd be just fine on the main page! I guess we'll just have to wait for Wheller's evaluation... —Jamn liciousness
Thanks, I'm glad you like it. I was thinking of making your logo the wordmark on the top left-hand corner like you said. Or, we can leave your logo on the main page, and put mine as the website background. Oo7nightfire 21:09, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
Season 9 character images Edit
All character box images should be in engine pictures of the characters, with the exception of anyone who has not been shown in engine such as North Dakota and Carolina --WhellerNG 01:24, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Red and Blue Teams, Season 9 Edit
- look at the team templates. I've already added in links to their season 9 versions. work in those. --WhellerNG 03:07, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm beginning their pages now. Would've done it sooner. Had yard work to do. Whos going to mulch it but me though eh?Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 03:58, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Image screen captures Edit
From now on. Everyone who screen caps an image from Youtube should insure that the image is captured in full screen at 720p. We've had a lot of Low quality images added to the wiki lately, and we should really work on getting some nicer quality images.--WhellerNG 18:53, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
The whoring of edits was the wikia errors. While I apologize for that it was the fact you entirely removed an image rather than put it somewhere else on the page.Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 23:23, July 18, 2011 (UTC)
Alright I am sick of the fighting.Listen sometimes a picture can be replaced and the other can be completely removed.I have seen it happen several times on this wiki and yet no one has ever said anything until now.If you feel like the other picture is needed then put it in a gallery or in the page somewhere as a thumb.Its just a picture you guys.So please lets just get it over and done with.Also wiki errors happen its a common thing.Note:I am not taking sides I am merely trying to look at the situation from the others few point.--The Renegade 00:18, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
And I apologized for the wikia errors. And to be honest after he told me that they were just wikia errors I would have unbanned him because it was my bad. However for account sharing which I am no longer doing I was demoted to a regular user and therefore could not unban him.Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 00:33, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
Yes I know.I just don't either you and Jman to start fighting like this.Friends should not fight like bitter foes.--Jean the Monster 00:35, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Jman, Sniper. If you two ever bring this up again. I'm going to ban both of you for six months.--WhellerNG 02:27, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Alright alright. So Wheller. Just a question. As both South and Director Church's Luke McKay pictures have been proven as incorrecet illustrations of the characters in Red vs. Blue are they still to be taken as canon?Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 02:30, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
- No. But they are still acceptable. --WhellerNG 02:38, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean by acceptable? Like for characters whose faces haven't been seen yet we are supposed to assume thats how they appear?Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 02:39, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
You know what. I actually feel I have to agree. I mean just look at how they've acted in the Season 9 PSAs already. Their friends unlike the episodes. So I guess I'll have to agree with you Jman.Sniperteam82308 I Wanna Pony 17:10, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
- PSAs are not canon. The PSAs portray the Reds and Blues as Actors who play their characters in the popular web series Red vs. Blue.--WhellerNG 03:20, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
Featured Article Edit
Just a thought Edit
How many people are on this wiki? I thought there would be groups of people in the chat room to discuss the latest episodes :o Mr.Orange 08:17, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
Is Wheller still our only resident admin, or are the new ones now? 18.104.22.168 23:12, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
So Wheller is gone? 22.214.171.124 01:28, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Good, he wouldn't let anyone do anything on here. Thanks for the info. 126.96.36.199 01:38, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Still though, I've been watching around here for awhile and he threatened to ban people for putting in somthing that they thought was true when it was an honest mistake. 188.8.131.52 03:23, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
He's still an admin isn't he? 184.108.40.206 03:27, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Still no reason to act like it's good that he's not as active. He's not a vandal, so, no reason to be happy. Sure, he goes a bit overboard sometimes, but he's still doing his job. I mean, he kept this wiki in shape for a LONG ass time before he promoted Sniper and Cyrus. Appreciate that. And just to let you know, yes, he is still an B'crat. So, yeah, deal with it. Sorry for coming out as harsh, but I'm sick of people insulting people because they can. And also, the thing you mentioned about adding something that isn't true, but they think it's true, is called Speculation. And it's against this wiki's policy. So, yeah, a warning is issued by any admin for speculation. Don't know what speculation is? Here, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculative_reason
Whatever, I don't like him, and he does go over board sometimes, but I guess I just couldn't find anything good that he's done for people around here. Makes sense though, disliked things are more recognised than liked ones.
And what do I know on the subject? For all I know I've got everything backwards. Though I think we might need a new admin or two. Add a bit more diversity to what goes on here.
P.S That wasn't what I was getting at, but I'm gonna shut up now. 220.127.116.11 04:26, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
Community Links Edit
May I suggest replacing the Arby n the Chief Wiki link to the Halo Nation wiki, since Halo has more to do with RvB than ANTC. Don't get me wrong, I love ANTC, but it doesn't have much relevance to RvB (save for the "King" episode). Oo7nightfire 22:41, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
What do you mean?--Oo7nightfire 23:26, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
And plus, it's better to link to a fellow web-series rather then the original thing it's based on. If you can negotiate with Halo Nation, then I can add it. —Jamn liciousness 23:48, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
RE: Community LinksEdit
Wow, that's way better & much more convienient! Fantastic job, Jman! P.S.- I really like your ANTC wiki a lot more than the original. --Oo7nightfire 00:21, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
What happened to the extra community links? And on the Freelancer character section, can we change C.T. to Connecticut, to avoid confusion. Also, on the seasons section, Season 1 is replaced with the word "Yes". Oo7nightfire 11:28, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
Question 1: Why is this page locked?
Question 2: Should we add Red vs. Blue: MIA to the Series section?
Question 3: Can we add back the extra community links? (Halo Nation, RT website, & RoosterTooths) They would be really helpful to the wikia.
Oo7nightfire 00:05, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
1: Because some users can't be trusted.
2: I thought it was. It will be added.
3: Yes... I don't know how they were removed.
01:01, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
Burnie uses the wiki Edit
http://twitter.com/#!/burnieburns/status/136568342566797313 18.104.22.168 00:21, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
Halo Nation Edit
I know Halopedian.com isn't connected to wikia's network, but may I suggest we use it instead of Halo Nation? Halopedian is much more reliable and higher in quality. I am in this world, but not of it. 15:41, November 16, 2011 (UTC)
Gun lowering technique Edit
I was just wondering, on the SMG page, it mentions the gun lowering technique, I thought it would be a good idea to add a page, but as I do not have an account on this Wiki, I thought I had better leave it to someone who actually has. Thanks.
It shouldn't have it's own pg bcuz it is too much of a minor thing; it would be better to add it to another pg, specifically to the Machinima pg.
P.S.- You don't need an account to edit on the wiki. Oo7nightfire 21:09, May 16, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I just want to know how to do it on both the Default control scheme and the Inverted control scheme for Reach. And as the page did not get the approval it is probably best that I did not go ahead and make it anyway, but thanks for the vote of confidence Oo7nightfire.
You're welcome, and you can probably find a bunch of tutorials on lowering the gun on YouTube. Oo7nightfire 21:16, May 17, 2012 (UTC)
Should there be a coloumn for AI in the character section JB nine90 10:39, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
No need for a column at the moment, because only a few AIs have made a big impact in the series. The ones that have are all included (Gary, Epsilon, O'Malley, etc.). If more AIs appear in S10 & make a significant impact, say Sigma who could be added, they could be considered for their own column. Oo7nightfire 11:16, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
Should Carolina be moved to the 'other' section, as she's gone rogue from project freelancer? The Meta is in the other section because he went rogue, so shouldn't Carolina also be moved there? Or The Meta be kept on the Freelancer section?Socksucker 21:01, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
Yes! You were right, it just wasn't updated since Hate to Say Goodbye I'm guessing. It has been done, thanks for bringing it to our attention! Sniper (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 02:04, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if this is viewed as 'important', and since I'm still fairly new to this Wiki I was wondering how often the Polls get changed? It's been the same poll for as long as I've been on, and I don't know if it's hard to do (since I'm new-ish). I think, if possible (like I said I don't know anything about the process), we should try and have a weekly poll, with questions on Favorite Characters, Favorite Seasons, Favorite Episodes from Seasons, Favorite Armor Enhancements etc. Just a suggestion, and if it's too hard to do then that makes sense.
The poll hasn't been changed since August, and I know I've said this before but I think it should be changed more often. I understand that the Admins are always busy making this Wiki even better, and you all do a damn good job, and I also understand that in the grand scheme of things polls aren't very important, but I think it would be a good thing. I'd be quite happy to update it with a new poll every month, I think I know how to do it, and I think it would be quite interesting if we created a page to display the results from all the polls from this point onwards. I know this isn't really important, but let me know what you think Socksucker (talk) 19:36, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
Old Rule Edit
So, there is a rule that only machinima pictures can be used for a character if that character has been shown in machinima. No CGI. York's page for instance has an ugly, blobby picture from Halo 2, as compared to the HQ pics from Seasons 9 & 10. I want to know what the commnity thinks! Respond to this saying what you think. And admins, if you're fair, you'll put it up as a poll question. Then we can see if we should stick with some old admin who's gone now, or go forward into what RvB has become. So, I leave you with one final question: What do YOU think? Awesomeperson487 (talk) 16:32, November 12, 2012 (UTC)Awesomeperson487
Well I looked around and I think the rule originated from WhellerNG, who yes, was a past admin. I never met him, but he's apparently gone now because he banned people for personal reasons, though I'm not quite sure. But despite that, it looked like he knew his shit when it came to wiki stuff, hence why he was an ADMIN. But yeah, he apparently came up with the rule though I haven't been able to find the reason why. You should talk with someone who knew him better. ♠₩€$₮€₢₦ ϭ€№♠ 18:07, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
"not all admins are responsible"....as opposed to you, who is messing up the character pages left right and centre, disregarding the rules, making stupid pages etc... yeah, real responsible, hypocrite. Socksucker (talk) 18:40, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
I think it would be better if we could use CGI pis as they just added HD so the articles would look much better, WhellerNG isn't an admin anymore so......yeah
I believe machinima pics should be used since RvB is ultimately and originally a machinima, so the characters should be shown as such because it fits the series' original style. In addition, I also believe the pics should represent how the character was most recently seen chronologically (e.g. Wash in blue armor as opposed to Steel/Yellow armor). In my opinion, I believe adding CGI pics would start numerous edit wars and result in lots of pages to become locked. Most of the infobox pics look fine the way they are in my opinion anyway, even York's. Oo7nightfire (talk) 10:59, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
Main Character Limit Edit
Hey I think that the main character section is alright as long as it stays the same with 29 (40 with E-D) characters. But, with a new season and saga coming up, new supporting/main characters will be introduce at some point. So I think we should know which characters will have to be removed if this happens. I went over it several times and come to the conclusion that Sigma, Gamma, Vic (as well as his epsilon double), Sister, and possibly Andy (as well as his epsilon double) would be the best to remove because these characters didn't have many apearances and/or didn't affect the plot as much as the others listed. What do you guys think? From: Agent Maroon78 (talk) 23:10, June 5, 2013 (UTC)
Also, I forgot to say that some characters should stay no matter what because they are: A) a main character in more than one saga, B) have appeared in many episodes, or C) have a large impact on the series that spans through more than one saga. In my opinion those who would fit here are:
Red Team: Sarge, Simmons, Grif, Donut, and Lopez. So pratically everyone on the team is safe.
Blue Team: Church, Tucker, Caboose, Tex, Epsilon, Washington and possibly Sheila. Sheila and Sister were supporting roles during the Blood Gulch Chronicles (but Sheila was a supporting role during the entire saga) and since then they have less of a role in the later sagas so they can be removed if they become more over shadowed.
Project Freelancer: Director, Carolina, Wyoming, York, Delta, and Omega. The Dakotas were a major character in the Project Freelancer saga, but (very) minor characters in other sagas. While Sigma and Gamma are major villians in one saga, they only have a few appearances and are more used to explain a situation.
Others: Doc and the Meta. Andy and Vic were more of a supporting role during the Blood Gulch Chronicles and have only minimal appearances. Although C.T. and the Insurrectionist Leader have a large impact they also have very few appearances.
After reviewing season 5 I noticed that in ep. The Grif Reaper , Sister states, "Your Commander died. And one of the troops is going to be promoted, and I was sent to replace the missing troop!" I wonder who was going to be promoted, Church or Tucker . Church had already self proclaimed himself as the CO of Blue Team, and consider himself as a Captain, as stated in ep. You Can't Park Here , "You don't outrank me I'm a Captain!" Tucker isn't much of a leader nor have any desire to lead, but his combat skills could possible be considerd the best out of the Reds and Blue (excluding Wash).--Tyler311 (talk) 03:45, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
This would've gone better on that episode's talk page. Also, this is trival and something that's never going to be explained anyway. Does it really even matter?
If I was to make a guess I'd say Church, just because it appears Command didn't give two shits about them once they stuck them in the canyon, and Church is the Alpha and all. Any real soldier capabilites are irrelevant seeing as they were never intended to be real soldiers. ♠₩€$₮€₢₦ ϭ€№♠ 02:52, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
hi im new to this site and just had a question... is there a reason i've yet to see donut or doc in season 11 so far? did something happen to them when the ship crashed or have they just been flat out not shown?22.214.171.124 02:50, July 14, 2013 (UTC)PROTECT ME CONE
- When the gang went after Church & Carolina, Doc was left behind at Valhalla. As far as we know he is still there. Donut may have went back to Valhalla. We don;t know. -- Delta
- In the future, you should ask any questions related to Season 11 in the blog regarding speculation for this season, found here. This topic has been discussed a few times, so you might find additional info there, though Deb1701 pretty much summed it up. Specific questions regarding Seasons, episodes, characters etc. are better to be discussed on the talk page of the page related to the question, or else in a blog post created by yourself or another. I believe this talk page is for questions regarding the Wiki in general. Socksucker (talk) 16:52, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
Hey, this is Agent Maroon78. I'm just making this poll to have the community decide which characters should be removed from the character roster at the end of each season.
Currently, I and oo7nightfire agree to remove Sister for Freckles. We also agree to remove 3 of the 4 listed below for others, but we're not sure. So out of these listed characters, vote for which character should stay and which should be removed.
While I don't think Freckles should be added there, I do think that Sigma and Sister should be removed, mainly due to their short lifespan in the series (each only appearing in one season, while appearing minor in another). I believe that Gamma should stay, along with C.T. and Vic, however. I think that only characters who had signinficance for more than one season should be up there (mainly the core Blood Gulch characters, a few Freelancers, and some neutral characters). Just my thoughts. —I'm a Koala 20:59, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
I have to agree with Jman, as much as I love Sigma and Sister especially Sister, both should be removed and Freckles shouldn't be on the list. He's more a plot device than a character, and I doubt he'll make it out of this season. I suggest refraining from adding him unless he appears as a main character again next season, and I do use the term main lightly. Gamma, C.T., and Vic all are very important to the plot, though C.T. at a lesser degree than the other two. Sniper (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 21:16, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
Well, this isn't just about one saga, but the overall series. We should include current main characters so that this wiki is shown to be up to date with the series (Lopez 2.0, Locus, Felix, and Freckles) due to the impact they have on the current saga. If they don't become main characters in the next season, then I agree to remove them, but the point still remains that they are main characters in Season 11. I would agree to allow Vic to stay except he has just as few appearances as Sigma (even if you consider Vic and Vic Jr. the same, they only appeared in 12 episodes). Not to mention he hasn't appeared since BGC and hasn't had a impact to the series since then, unlike Gamma who was not only a supporting character in BGC, but also a minor character in the later two sagas. Anyway, this is the point of why I made this poll, so that we could discuss this and agree who should be removed. So I appreciate your thoughts and contribution to this topic. From: Agent Maroon78 (talk) 22:19, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
Well, so far the characters you've listed have only appeared in one season, thus they're not all that important overall in the series. Gamma was introduced in Season 3 and was a fairly big character, even being one of the big bads, of the Blood Gulch Chronicles, he again appeared as a cameo and was mentioned at least once every 3-4 episodes in Reconstruction, and returned as a minor character in Season 10. He is important to the overall saga. C.T. was a major character in both Recreation and Season 10, he also appeared in Season 9 and was what led Wash and Maine to the desert in Revelation, point being ever since his appearance he's been mentioned or shown at least once every season and usually as important. Vic, I'll agree, he was only important during the Blood Gulch Chronicles, but what he did there earns him his spot as being a major character to Red vs. Blue. For all we know, Locus could be killed off this season along with Freckles. Lopez 2.0 is hardly important, only used as a joke just like Lopez now, the only thing Lopez 2.0 has done is repair the comm tower, that's literally all he's done. He is not a major character even this season. Felix, I'd consider a minor character as he has only appeared in the later half of the season. Locus has spent most of the season spying, while he did attack last episode one attack does not make him on the list. My point is, the rest have all done something to heavily impact Red vs. Blue while the current cast has not. I'm not saying they won't become main characters, but honestly we should wait a few more seasons until we add them. Sniper (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 22:46, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
Okay, first off, I listed the female/Freelancer C.T., not the Insurrectionist Leader/Recreation C.T. Second, while I currently agree to remove Sister and Sigma, just know that they've also appeared more than Vic (and Sigma also has a major impact to the series like Vic). Third, I'm not against Gamma to stay on the roster. Fourth, Freckles has proven vital to the plot of the current "saga" and has appeared in more episodes than Sigma. Lastly, you might be right about Felix & Lopez 2.0 not to be added to the roster, but others on the site have been shown to want to add them and that I made this poll to discuss if we should or shouldn't. I respect your decision and I hope you respect mine. From: Agent Maroon78 (talk) 23:07, October 28, 2013 (UTC
Alright, if it's the Freelancer C.T., then I'll have to agree that she is not all that important to the plot and able to be removed. Neither Sigma nor Sister has appeared more than Vic as he and Vic Jr. are one and the same. I'm not saying you're against Gamma staying on the roster, however he is one of the characters up there on the list and as such needed to be defended. Freckles is again important to this season, though as a plot device and not a character. I never said that Sigma should be on the list, I agree he shouldn't be. If you made this poll to discuss, then that is what I'm discussing, why they shouldn't be added. I do respect your decision, but I disagree with it and thus am discussing why I'm against it. Sniper (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 23:17, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
I agree to remove Sister, Freelancer C.T., and Sigma. I also have to agree with Sniper in regards to Freckles; he is more of a plot device than an actual character (as of now anyways). As for Locus and Felix, Locus hasn't really done anything yet, he's just a villain right now, and Felix I would say is a supporting character. But like Sniper said, we should wait a season before adding anyone to the list. As for now, I say we remove Sigma, Sister, and C.T. --Oo7nightfire (talk) 01:11, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
The Halo Wiki and Grifball Wiki would be a more appropriate affiliates to the RvB than the RWBY Wiki. Unlike the RWBY wiki, the Halo and Grifball wikis have many pages that link to and from the RvB wiki. --Bron Hañda 00:48, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
New Holiday FeatureEditHoliday Plans on the front page. --Bron Hañda 20:39, December 7, 2013 (UTC) You Had Me at Halo. --Bron Hañda 03:34, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
updating the main characters pageEdit
do you think we should change the Main characters display on the main page so that they reflect the current story arc? like, switch out project freelancer for the new republic and the federal army?Sol420 (talk) 00:26, April 29, 2014 (UTC)Sol420
No, Project Freelancer will stay since it has been in the series for 10 seasons. Certain characters like Locus, Felix, and Kimball may make it to the list someday though. Oo7nightfire (talk) 00:32, April 29, 2014 (UTC)
While I agree with adding Felix and Locus on the list of main characters on the main page, I think it needs to be changed a little more; specifically, I believe that Vic should be removed for the Chairman. Reason is because while Vic is a supporting antagonist for the Blood Gulch Chronicles, the Chairman proves to be a more major character, being a supporting character in the Recollections, a minor character in Season 10, and a main antagonist in the fourth saga. Not to mention, Vic has only appeared in 15 episodes (and that's if you also include his Epsilon-double) while the Chairman appears in at least 20 episodes.
If some argue we shouldn't because Vic's a "fan favorite" or an original character of the series, those are not valid reasons. The "Main Character" display on the page is for that reason: main characters. Vic has been absent from the series for a long time, making him have less of a impact, while the Chairman continues to appear in multiple sagas and is more involved. From: Agent Maroon78 (talk) 17:24, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
Rooster Teeth Family Template Edit
I Think That The Template Should Be Altered To Match The Rest Of The Main Page And Also Reorganized A Bit Since It Looks Really Out Of Place To Me.
Also Not To Be Backpedal But I Think We Should Have Waited To Add It Until All The Wikis Agreed. Seems Odd For RWBY Wiki (Whom We've Been Affiliated With Since The Show Started) To Not Have It While We Do. Not Sure. —Jman98 03:14, July 12, 2016 (UTC)
You may need to talk to the guys who contacted us about it. I'm sure they can make the changes necessary for this wiki. I, personally, don't really see the problem with the footer since it still features the RWBY wiki. That's just me. Oo7nightfire (talk) 02:06, July 13, 2016 (UTC)
Red vs blue roleplay site
There is a great roleplay site i just made for roleplaying red vs blue in which you can roleplay as either an oc in the main tab. or as canon characters in the second tab. i hope to be able to advertize this to all of you and be able to let this small thing grow large. if you want to check it out, please click the link Here